Search for: "United States v. General Electric Company"
Results 261 - 280
of 679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm
The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
[viii] The major sponsors of the Sochi Winter Olympics include General Electric, McDonalds, Panasonic, Samsung, Proctor & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and the Dow Chemical Company. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
EME Homer City Generation and American Lung Association v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
The site of such arbitration shall be London, United Kingdom. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Antony Anderson, an electrical engineer from the United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
The sponsors went from one medical practitioner to another seeking help imagining what lethal injections should look like in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
In the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan, EPA focused on improved heat efficiency, but it also recognized that emissions could be reduced by shifting generating load to sources that yielded fewer emissions per unit of electricity generated—whether owned by the same company or by some other company through a cap-and-trade regime. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 11:52 am
In the 21st century, assassination has risen repeatedly in the context of the shadow conflict between Iran and its proxies and Israel and the United States. * * * On September 19, 2024, Israel announced the arrest of an Israeli citizen who had been recruited by Iranian intelligence to conduct espionage and assassinate either the Israeli Prime Minister or the head of Shin Bet as “revenge for the killing of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Teheran. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:47 am
However, 12 years later in Tampa Electric Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
Study suggest they were. (271 Patent Blog) New test for evaluating patentability of algorithms: Ex parte Gutta (Found Persuasive) False patent marking roulette wheel (Patent Baristas) Selling goods in the US: the importance of correct patent marking (comparison of US and Australian laws) (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Georgia: Stay pending reexam granted prior to PTO’s grant of petition for reexam: E-Z-GO et al v Club Car (Patent… [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
LLC (Patently-O) CAFC affirms claim construction using comparative language: Funai Electric Company v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
He and his wife sued several companies, including Special Electric Company, Inc., and some automobile brake suppliers. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:29 pm
§262 says that a joint owner of a patent "may make, use, offer to sell, or sell the patented invention within the United States, or import the patented invention into the United States, without the consent of and without accounting to the other owners. [read post]
