Search for: "V D" Results 261 - 280 of 76,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2024, 7:44 am by Power Trial Lawyers
In this article, we will discuss resentencing pursuant to Penal Code 1170(d) in context of the court’s decision in People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:44 am
R (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Bailey) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison [2008] EWCA Civ 177; [2008] WLR (D) 84 “Long-term prisoners who had been convicted of offences committed after 29 September 1998 and before 4 April 2005, and who after 4 April 2005 had been released on licence, recalled and then re-released having served three-quarters of their sentences, remained subject to licence conditions… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 4:48 am by tracey
Maidment v Attwood and others: [2012] EWCA Civ 998;  [2012] WLR (D)  220 “Where a minority shareholder had brought a petition under section 994 of the Companies Act alleging that remuneration paid to a director of a now insolvent company in liquidation was excessive and therefore unfairly prejudicial, there was no basis in the statutory provisions or in principle or in authority to impose a requirement for diligence on shareholders in regards to the… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:42 am by tracey
Wilkinson v Fitzgerald and Churchill Insurance Company Ltd: Evans v Cockayne and Equity Claims Ltd, Secretary of State for Transport intervening: [2012] EWCA Civ 1166: [2012] WLR (D)  260 “Where an insured driver permitted an uninsured driver to use his motor vehicle in which he then was injured as a passenger, the insured as passenger was entitled to receive sums from a judgment against the negligent driver and would not automatically be excluded from the… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by tracey
Regina (Munir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening): Regina (Rahman) v Same: [2012] UKSC 32;  [2012] WLR (D)  213 “If a statement of an immigration policy was flexible and stated that an immigration rule relating to leave to enter and remain in the United Kingdom might, depending on the circumstances of each case, be relaxed if certain conditions were satisfied, the statement… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:37 am
Lifely v Lifely [2008] EWCA Civ 904; [2008] WLR (D) 280 “Where fresh evidence had arguably been wrongfully obtained considerations beyond the classical requirements under the Ladd v Marshall test might be appropriate when the court was considering whether such evidence should be admitted. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:59 am
Catalyst Investment Group Ltd v Lewinsohn and others; Catalyst Investment Group Ltd and another v Lewinsohn and another; ARM Asset-Backed Securities SA v Lewinsohn and another [2009] EWHC 1964 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 281 “Where corresponding proceedings were in existence between the same parties in another jurisdiction, the court had no power to grant a stay, [...] [read post]