Search for: "Ware v. Ware" Results 261 - 280 of 590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm by Stuart Kaplow
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 are not… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:09 am
In a kinder and gentler time, before the era when big pharma v. generic Notice of Compliance litigation has almost taken over the Federal Court, Canada used to have lots of litigation about beer and spirits. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Larry Munn
In a recent decision of Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal, Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am by Sander Gelsing
Again, I see some descriptiveness issues with this mark, as in being descriptive of the persons employed in the production of these wares. [read post]