Search for: "Williams v. Superior Court" Results 261 - 280 of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Carol Williams reporting in the LATimes does a superb job of describing California's Lewis Carroll like parole system for those sentenced to life in prison for murder, with the possibility of parole; a topic which has given the California Supreme Court cause for psycho-therapy and now looms over the 9th Circuit (Hayward v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 The Pennsylvania Supreme Court noted that this was an issue of first impression in its Court.The Bristol decision reverses the Pennsylvania Superior Court's previous ruling in Hopkins v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 However, where the issue of the superior right of possession can be determined separately from title issues, the justice court has jurisdiction to decide the case. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
SUPERIOR COURT DECISIONS IN POST-KOKEN CASE O'Hara v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 8:25 am by Jon L. Gelman
The NJ Superior Court dismissed, and the NJ Appellate Court {NJAD] affirmed the dismissal. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:26 pm
If discovery indicates that some of Carter's Reed's claims for Relacore were scientifically sound, then the trial court would have options including subdividing, or in a worst-case scenario, decertifying the class.The burden would be on the plaintiff to provide the necessary evidence to support the allegations that justified the grant of class certification, the court observed.The September 29 opinion in Lee v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 3:18 pm
In Barboza, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge William F. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 12:08 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Williams-Sonoma * California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) * Ninth Circuit: FACTA Does not Cover Emailed Receipts — Simonoff v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:02 am
 The Court of Appeals found that the Superior Court Judgeconcluded that the initial search warra [read post]