Search for: "Wood v. Powers"
Results 261 - 280
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2025, 8:55 am
By focusing on the start of the famous passage, we find that Coke likely drew from his own theory of repugnant acts in The Case of Alton Woods. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
I suppose that’s a promising rule if you think government power must always be expanded. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
The case in question, FTC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Lisa Inman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
Sebelius and the Third Circuit Case Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am
The dust continues to settle from Wednesday’s argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
Judge Wood’s opinion for the court in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Reg. 359/09 (Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Perry argument 1/13/2010 NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 8:24 pm
The employee filed a human rights complaint in Wood v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
Today, we bring you guest commentary on Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:23 am
In Rhodes v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:56 am
" Georgia v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP (Fed. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 16 to 19 April 2018, Nicklin J heard the trial in the case of Monir v Wood. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In this case, Mr Malcolm pointed out that Article 8 is a very broad right (a point which has often been made in posts on this blog), and that it encompasses expansive and rather amorphous concepts such as a person’s “physical and psychological integrity” (Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1 at [66]) and “personal autonomy“ (R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 at [21]-[22]). [read post]
