Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 8,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 4:41 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
While he knows the case was watched closely by other attorneys, he believes the court's decision in Santos v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:37 pm
Young v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:31 am
The Court has granted certiorari in the following cases: 12-1226, Young v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:27 pm
And so it has come to pass that a young assistant state attorney, who frequented an aforementioned establishment, ( one would expect in an attempt to satisfy some prurient interest, see, e.g, Miller v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:46 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:54 pm
On January 28, 2009, the Court denied motions field by the Fieger law firm to disqualify Justices Corrigan, Markman, and Young from participating in Pellegrino v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 8:17 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
He also constituted a qualifying young person for the purposes of the Education Act. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Young, 100 Ill.App.2d 20 (1st Dist. 1968). [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Ninth Circuit Sends the Hawaii Concealed Carry Challenge Back Down to District Court
19 Aug 2022, 1:30 pm
Bruen, 597 U.S. ___ (2022)," Young v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:44 pm
Penn State Coach Joseph V. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
The United States Supreme Court recently issued a new decision, Montgomery v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:01 am
Oscar Perez, along with an accomplice, broke into the home of a young woman and her thirteen-year-old son. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 2:16 pm
How did United States v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
., state prison vs. county jail). [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
Examining legislative intent, the Court noted that the predecessor statute from which §11-604(b) was derived also focused exclusively on restitution as applied to child defendants or respondents and their parents, and a subsequent revision further verified that the General Assembly did not intend to include adult defendants within the purview of the limit on restitution orders.The Court further noted that its interpretation of the statute was consistent with the rehabilitative purpose of… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
On May 28, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 2:42 pm
From today’s United States v. [read post]
