Search for: "Able v. United States" Results 2781 - 2800 of 10,806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2016, 6:47 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
In the United States, the [Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”)] does not contain a specific provision addressing this issue. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2011) (noting that to carry its burden under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, the pa- tentee must sufficiently “tie the expert testimony on damages to the facts of the case”).As to the injunction:Yet, the injunction states that SAP “shall not (a) charge to or accept payment of software maintenance from that customer with respect to any of the Infringing Products in the United States; or (b) license or sell any new ‘seats’ or otherwise charge… [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:56 am by Earl Drott
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, had diversity jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
United States Steel Corporation, to be argued on Monday. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:24 am by Dennis Crouch
United States highlights the longstanding difficulty in defining regulatory taking as well as determining when a regulatory takings claim becomes ripe for judicial review. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Winkelman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am by Will Baude
  In Windsor, the United States asked for the judgment to be affirmed, which should have scuttled the case. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:18 am by JD Hull
Stern predicts that, in a new Florida case before Supreme Court, the Court's holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 11:34 pm
On the one hand, the CAFC noted the CAFC's decision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]