Search for: "Fields v. United States" Results 2781 - 2800 of 5,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 10:14 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
But the lowest common denominator was not the organizing principle that got the military justice system into the mess that became United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:38 am by Mary Whisner
Photos: Eric Schnapper from University of Washington School of Law; Supreme Court bench from United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am by Florian Mueller
That makes sense.At the same time, Pfizer and BioNTech have made a strategically very smart move, too:With its narrative that portrays CureVac as a sore loser (without using that term), the complaint is directed not only at the court of law (and the jury to be selected further down the road) but also at the court of public opinion.Pfizer is headquartered in New York but has a home-field advantage anywhere in the United States, and BioNTech has one of its two U.S. offices… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:44 pm by Jack Goldsmith
”  In support of his submission that the President has broad, undefined powers over foreign affairs, the Secretary quotes United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
AUKUS: Biden’s New Security Agreement On Sept. 15, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia announced a new security agreement. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
The Convention on Conventional Weapons Protocol V (on Explosive Remnants of War) also regulates US use of cluster munitions, as it is a state party to this international treaty. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States On 5 December 2017 there will be hearing in a defamation claim involving President Trump’s alleged sexual harassment of a former contestant on the Apprentice. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
City of Burlington 15-156Issue: Whether the Federal Aviation Act preempts all state and local general land-use regulation aimed at addressing off-site airport noise, as the Vermont Supreme Court and other state high courts have held, or whether it preempts only those state and local general land-use regulations that conflict with federal law or intrude into a preempted field in their scope and effect, as the Second Circuit and several other federal courts of… [read post]