Search for: "Lowe v. State"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 9,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 2:50 pm
But if the state chooses to provide a generally available scholarship program that includes religious schools, it has to include those schools without regard to religion; that’s a basic command of the First Amendment (see, e.g., Larson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:47 pm
A federal judge in Colorado has shut down a uranium leasing program in that state, finding that the Department of Energy violated the National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act (Colorado Environmental Coalition v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
Those were the questions reviewed by the New York State Court of Appeals in 328 Owners Corp. v. 330 W. 86 Oaks Corp. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:31 pm
The deterrents in Canada along with the penalties for drunk driving are low. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:48 am
The question in Norse Energy v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:28 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:50 am
Forcellati v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:31 am
The first is Klayman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 8:18 am
Geffner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Part V suggests that Congress should allow the USPTO to discourage abuse from short-selling IPR petitioners by using rule-making authority and discretionary authority, rather than seeking a Congressional Act. 98 J. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule IV Drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with a low potential for abuse and low risk of dependence. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule IV Drugs, substances, or chemicals are defined as drugs with a low potential for abuse and low risk of dependence. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
See Cascade Health Solutions v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Decision in full:United States District Court,N.D. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
” State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 6:48 pm
The historic case of James v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:35 am
Ortovox v Mammut The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:36 pm
If it was not, in the circumstances it couldonly, and impermissibly,have been based upon his Honour’s own views aboutthose matters.Family ViolenceThe Full Court stated, quoting the trial judge: Itis my assessment, after reading all the relevant police material in evidence,the affidavit evidence and seeing and hearing boththe mother and father givingoral evidence, that the mother is not, and has never been, fearful of the fatherbut that she has abusedthe system in place to protect… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
Circuit in Crooker v. [read post]
