Search for: "STATE v. MOORE"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 3,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2010, 7:19 am
(IPKat) Canada Balanced Copyright for Canada board and funding revealed (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Angus calls out Moore on WIPO: says fails to understand treaty, makes mockery of copyright balance (Michael Geist) McKennitt Op-Ed: ‘Pirates are killing musicians, composers, lyricists, even popcorn vendors’ (Michael Geist) CMCC speaks out against C-32 digital lock provisions (Michael Geist) Canadian video game maker criticizes C-32 digital lock rules (Michael Geist)… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm
(IPKat) Canada Balanced Copyright for Canada board and funding revealed (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Angus calls out Moore on WIPO: says fails to understand treaty, makes mockery of copyright balance (Michael Geist) McKennitt Op-Ed: ‘Pirates are killing musicians, composers, lyricists, even popcorn vendors’ (Michael Geist) CMCC speaks out against C-32 digital lock provisions (Michael Geist) Canadian video game maker criticizes C-32 digital lock rules (Michael Geist)… [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1330 (11th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
On 17 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick P, Black and Lewison LJJ) gave judgment in the case of JX MX (A child proceeding by her Mother and Litigation Friend Mrs AXMX) v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
We have posted on this debate which is also discussed on Martin Moore’s blog. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
Case Study No. 2 Moore & Co., P.A. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:20 am
The Factual Time Line Leading up to the Whistleblower Claim The case, Furhr v Trinity Health Corp., (2013), involved a plaintiff who was hired by the hospital, a subsidiary of Trinity Health, in 2007. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am
The new classes cover a wide-range of topics, including business law (Critical Legal Concerns Facing Entrepreneurs presented by Carolyn Hochstadter, Esq. and Recent Developments in Personal Jurisdiction Following Daimler AG v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Today’s case is Dimieri v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
There are at least five videos of "Joyful Noise” online which have a collective total of 1,365,041 YouTube views, 1,531,856 plays on Moore’s Myspace page and 933,868 on Gray’s Myspace page. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am
There are at least five videos of "Joyful Noise” online which have a collective total of 1,365,041 YouTube views, 1,531,856 plays on Moore’s Myspace page and 933,868 on Gray’s Myspace page. [read post]
U.S. appeals court unlikely to grant Apple an injunction against Samsung over three software patents
4 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm
He expressed great admiration for Apple's contribution to innovation in a 2013 ruling in an Apple v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 8:31 am
Additional Resources: Roberts Company, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit invalidated an Illinois law barring most people from publicly carrying loaded guns in Moore v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In doing so, the Court effectively overruled the Federal Circuit’s State Street Bank v. [read post]
