Search for: "United States v. Bank of the United States"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 6,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 4:19 am
“Plaintiffs demonstrated a reasonable excuse for their default (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]), based on law office failure, as detailed in the affirmation of their former counsel who miscalendared the motion (CPLR 2005; People’s United Bank v Latini Tuxedo Mgt., LLC, 95 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2d Dept 2012]). [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
“Plaintiffs demonstrated a reasonable excuse for their default (CPLR 5015[a][1]), based on law office failure, as detailed in the affirmation of their former counsel who miscalendared the motion (CPLR 2005; People’s United Bank v Latini Tuxedo Mgt., LLC, 95 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2d Dept 2012]). [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:18 am
For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-petition-graham-v-us For more on these cases:https://www.eff.org/cases/united-states-v-graham Contact: JenniferLynchSenior Staff Attorneyjlynch@eff.org AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Before the discussion, Clare Cushman will introduce viewers to the Society’s newest publication, An Illustrated Guide to the Supreme Court.The Organization of American Historians is circulating the amicus brief it joined in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Public utility regulation as a distinct field of law arose at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Stern v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 12:43 pm
Toney was Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
While prospects for significant federal spending on a new broadband program remain in limbo, Congress has allocated further funding to the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) ReConnect funding for 2020 (item below). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
Moreover, the purpose of the extortion scheme was to threaten the Finnish partners into repaying Daniels' loan to a bank account in the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:19 pm
Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 7:33 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Apr. 8, 2015), and Kraft v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:11 pm
United States, 10-647C, 2012 WL 668593 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
“A Question of Trust”; and the report of the Royal United Services Institute: “A Democratic Licence to Operate”. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm
§ 2383 provides: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
