Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 2781 - 2800 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Code § 2255 seeking a new trial “on the basis that “her trial attorney was so ineffective as to deprive her of the competent counsel guaranteed by the 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:37 am by Nabiha Syed
One of yesterday’s grants was United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm by Shea Denning
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
  Moreover, it argues, U.S. courts have jurisdiction under the FSIA’s “commercial activity” exception, which (among other things) allows lawsuits based on conduct that takes place outside the United States “in connection with a commercial activity of a foreign state” and causes a direct effect in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:30 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, the criminal case arising out of New Jersey’s infamous “Bridgegate” scandal. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Adam Chandler
Yesterday Senate Democrats were unable to break a Republican filibuster on the DISCLOSE Act, a legislative response to the Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am by Erin Miller
Times previews Holder v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The court took note of the pending United States Supreme Court review in Ex Parte Medellin (Tex.Crim.App. 2006) 223 S.W.3d 315, cert. granted Apr. 30, 2007, sub nom. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Siegel, Yale Law SchoolDeborah Dinner, Washington University in St. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
M’Intosh’s discovery doctrine in Wi Parata v. [read post]