Search for: "Doctor v. State" Results 2801 - 2820 of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 10:55 am
In Maryland, and in most states, the medical malpractice doctrine of “informed consent” requires that doctors (in a non-emergency setting) present the patient with important information about the nature of their ailment, the nature of the proposed treatment, the probability of success of contemplated therapy and its alternatives, and the risk of unfortunate consequences associated with such treatment. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:21 am by Ilya Shapiro
But such regulations can’t be extended beyond that bright line of specialized knowledge: If a state can require its doctors to read a pre-written advertisement to their patients, it can force them to say anything the state wants. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
In Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor [2014] UKSC 68, the Supreme Court considered the ambit of the right under s 4. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am by Cathy Reno
” The New York Times Artsbeat Blog reports on Justice Scalia’s role as an unlikely “script doctor” in response to a screenwriter hoping to write a comedy about Maine seceding from the United States. [read post]