Search for: "In re Branch"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 5,890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2008, 4:12 am
They're trying to protect America's favorite corporate big dogs, and they're trying to protect the executive branch's unfettered power to wave the wand and say magic words like "executive privilege" and "classified information," etc., in order to get out of any mess they make, regardless of the repercussions for real people. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:02 pm
Judges Ho and Branch offer a similar recommendation in National Review. [read post]
27 May 2011, 1:19 pm
There is no public interest in favor of sustaining the act taken here, especially since the provisions of 2011 Wisconsin Act 10 can easily be re-enacted by the legislature if it so wishes (provided that any legislative re-enactment complies with the requirements of the Open Meetings Law). [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm
You're headed straight into the ground. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
Roberts and his right wing band have proven to be extreme conservative judicial activists with little respect for the text of the Constitution, precedent, and the role of the Legislative Branch. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
Judicial Conference Committee on the Judicial Branch, then chaired by Judge Frank M. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Design District: Situé au nord du Downtown, c’est le nouveau quartier branché. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:48 am
The jurisdiction you’re operating in likely has specific laws and regulations that may not be in line with the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in which the handbook was drafted. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:23 am
In re Nurnberg, 6 F.R.D. 69, 121 (1946, 47). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 6:16 pm
If they’re overmedicated, they can be at even higher risk of victimization. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:00 pm
Clearly, then, people who qualify for asylum -- and the U.S. government routinely denies asylum to people who merit asylum (the factfinding is done at the Executive Branch level, not at the judicial level, unless an Article III court will re-visit such factfinding on appeal), including for cynical political reasons (e.g., often people are more likely to win asylum if they are from a country whose government is at odds with the U.S. government, versus a government that is a U.S.… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:42 am
Go any further and you're asking for trouble. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
Judges have been putting the executive branch in check. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:34 am
They’re just good at hiding the madness. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:48 am
" http://j.mp/r3M5SI "Politician Violates His Own Two-Strikes Anti-Piracy Plan" http://j.mp/qOuCE2 #lwb486 a good list from salon of "The underacting hall of fame" http://j.mp/oLWYSk from @sciencepunk: "Five iconic science images, and why they're wrong" http://j.mp/orOtIg who wouldn't want to work at google, apple or facebook? [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 4:59 am
And while we all might agree that your rights end at my nose, do they end when I have a hunch they're on my nose? [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:30 am
Bush centers on two American lawyers who were advising the Oregon branch of a Saudi-based Muslim charity. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:16 am
You’re still dead. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:07 pm
With the case declared moot, the counsel contended, the Pentagon and Congress were left with nothing to bar them from re-instituting a new limit of military service by gays and lesbians. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 5:47 am
They're all scum. [read post]
