Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 2801 - 2820 of 4,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:42 am by John Delaney
Copyright Office states in its Compendium II of Copyright Office Practices, for a work to be copyrightable, it must “owe its origin to a human being,” and that materials produced solely by nature, by plants or by animals do not count. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:07 pm by Sami Z Azhari
Challenging Staleness and False Statements in Child Pornography Cases As the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals determined in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:04 am by Michael S. Levine and Rachel E. Hudgins
North Carolina was home to a DuPont production plant and now has the third highest PFAS exposure of any state.[1] It is also the venue of a spate of PFAS-related insurance coverage litigation, including Colony Insurance Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:01 am
Environmental Protection Agency to make sure the permit meets all state and federal regulations. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:38 am by Amy Howe
The plant injects the treated wastewater through wells into the groundwater; some of that groundwater eventually enters the Pacific Ocean. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:58 am by Jody Freeman
 For example, EPA sought the auto industry’s support for its historic tailpipe rule and went out of its way to design a flexible compliance program; reconsidered and revised its initial proposed standard for new power plants to address concerns about its legal vulnerability; and has signaled repeatedly that its forthcoming guidelines to govern state standards for existing power plants will afford the states maximum flexibility. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
The seeds of this disaster were planted by the Supreme Court over a decade ago, in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a rule rolling back an Obama-era policy that regulated the treatment of wastewater in coal plants. [read post]