Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 8:03 pm
Burney and I can at least agree on this much: We don’t want jurors going out and gathering evidence that wasn’t presented at trial. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm
As we stated in Heller and repeated in McDonald, "individual self-defense is 'the central component' of the Second Amendment right. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:20 am
Of course, in our nation's zeal to stop terrorism, it was crucial to limit habeas relief to a year so the terrorists don't win. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 11:46 am
But we don’t judge humans by the same standard. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
They simply canvass big business for the places they would least likely to get sued, or cherry-pick some decisions that they don't like.There is some whining about "trial lawyer money" influencing judges, but no indication as to how much money was spent by the Fortune 500.I briefly noted last year's report, quoting the Center for Justice and Democracy when they called the report "dishonest. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:01 pm
We didn't, but now we do. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
He said, `I don't think people should be able to say these things, and that's why, one of the reasons I am here and not taking it to trial and stuff, because I think it was wrong, and people shouldn't be let off if they say things like that. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:07 am
They aren't sentencing people, but defendants. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:06 pm
"I think the greatest sign of his remorse is that he stood up in the face of a life sentence and said ‘I did it and I don't want to put anybody through anything else.'" The boys' parents, Juan Luis Martinez and Maria Bustamante, testified their lives are forever changed. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:59 pm
His lyrics also included the phrase: "You don't deserve to be a judge and you don't deserve to live. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:00 pm
Do you want to be the judge who said we couldn't stop him until he hurt someone? [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 4:03 am
As I've argued in an earlier post, I don't think that "we" have a language adequate to analyzing the extent to which political considerations do indeed pay a proper role in the administration of justice, as against the point at which paying attention to such considerations counts as corruption. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:21 am
Put another way, deceptive marketing.The important official voices of this bar association spoke out in unison, we don't ask such questions. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:03 am
So the allegations, the sufficiency of the allegations simply cannot be to a Rule 12(b)(6) standard, because we haven't filed the complaint yet...So I can't assume that ... the standard requires a line by line, claim by claim analysis...I simply don't believe that that can be the standard. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:00 am
We don't have the right to risk our clients on the altar of our personal beliefs. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 7:03 am
We'll see.Grits feel like, once they get deep into the weeds, many of those ideas won't seem feasible. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:59 pm
And, I haven't mentioned that we do indeed get "full benefits". [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
There's something to be said about a tribunal with so firmly entrenched a sense of honor that it isn't necessarily trumped by outcome which makes me wonder whether, on a very practical level, the defendant doesn't stand a better chance before a military tribunal than before a federal judge sitting in an American courthouse. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 5:43 am
I don't have all day.... [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 3:06 am
(See Don Cruse's in-depth analysis on the Supreme Court of Texas Blog.) [read post]
