Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 51,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2009, 2:52 pm
In October I wrote about the risks of moving, pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38) and Anders v California (386 US 738), to be relieved as assigned appellate attorney on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issues. [read post]
3 May 2021, 10:19 am
Yet even with a track record for filing a high volume of decisions, some of the court’s justices allow cases to languish for as long as seven years — an extraordinary failure that causes untold harm to the people trapped in the backlog.Under national standards created by judges, court administrators, clerks and attorneys, 95% of appellate cases should be resolved within one year. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:56 am
Yet even then, as the recent case of Martin v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:32 pm
In Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:18 am
For those with the ability (or at least the patience) to decode Supreme People’s Court (SPC) President Zhou Qiang’s March, 2018 report to the National People’s Congress, it provides insights into the Chinese courts, economy, and society, and of course politics. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
I have a case preview at SCOTUSBlog at SCOTUSBlogfor Heffernan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
Case Name: People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Pazaratz’s decision in J.N. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:40 pm
This case will unquestionably enter my mind if the police ever come to my home and ask to enter. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
On a slightly different tack, I also found the opinion interesting, at a much deeper doctrinal level, because Justice Robie concludes that even though the detention by the police in this case was totally illegal (since, again, you can do it in the road), defendant can still get convicted of subsequently resisting this illegal detention -- that, as far as the exclusionary rule goes, the subsequent resisting "removed" the taint of the initial illegal detention.As far as that holding… [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
” Public Disobedience In People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 3:02 pm
The California Supreme Court decided yesterday in People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:23 pm
It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Locascia and Others v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 2:01 pm
(P.S. - Was I right or what about People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
So, as Justice Rylaarsdam quotes from a prior case, you're not obligated to "raise[] one or two frivolous issues, easily disposed of by the inspection of a few pages of transcript. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
In Atwater v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011, the Court of Appeals published its opinion in People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:45 pm
Since in past cases, like United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
