Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 6,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 4:29 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
State, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The Decision in particular allows for third party observations being filed without signature (see Article 2 of the Decision), the Notice states that “Observations may be filed anonymously”(see the 4th paragraph under point "Formal requirements") .Indeed, the boards of appeal of the EPO are bound only by the EPC, but the above dispositions in relation to anonymous third party observations are in line with earlier decisions of the boards, which did admit such… [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
The district court found the village liable under the Fair Housing Act for intentional discrimination, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is MHANY Management v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
Wizkids/NECA, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are… [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
Jazz music to Jazztel's ears, the Supreme Court upheld the Madrid Court’s decision, possibly putting the nail in the coffin of Orange’s (squared) colour monopoly dream in Spain.Also recalling previous Spanish and EU case-law (among other things, the CJEU decisions in Case 104/01, Liberteland in Case C-49/02, Bauchemie), the Supreme Court stated that colours generally lack of distinctive character and cannot play a proper distinctive role, as consumers… [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:37 pm
The landmark Supreme Court case, Brady v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 7:54 am
From DWJ v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:53 am
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 pm
Chandler v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:03 am
., L.P. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 5:46 am
The case is Matthew Fulks v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
Fictional characters themselves are protected by copyright. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
| "Big Box" not found generic or lacking distinctive character, but still .... | Changes to the Singapore copyright system: an update on the recent public consultations | he diplomatic crisis of Qatar and Gulf Cooperation Council's IP | Bundesgerichtshof's landmark ruling to hook extra-territorial patent infringement in Germany | BREAKING: Eli Lilly success as UK Supreme Court finds Actavis products directly and indirectly infringe pemetrexed patent | Monday Miscellany |… [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:03 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Paul Lewis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
Marvel Characters, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
