Search for: "State v. Words"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 36,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 8:46 am
" EDF Release: Supreme Court Win for Cross-State Air Pollution Rule<> Shell Oil Company v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:27 pm
The judge questioned where in the rules it stated that the document needed to be served with the actual bill. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:15 am
The case, State of Connecticut v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 2:47 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
That exception permitted reasonable non-competes to protect trade secrets, a curiously worded exception which could swallow the entire rule with some artful contract drafting.Today, I review a case addressing a more sensible exception, one which finds parallels in other states' non-compete laws. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 6:15 am
Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
The court began its analysis of the state-action doctrine by citing the seminal case of Parker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
(David Kopel) The State’s evidence is not compelling. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
(See, Ghory v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
Resolving conflicts between the New York State Human Rights Law and the National Labor Relations Act
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Resolving conflicts between the New York State Human Rights Law and the National Labor Relations ActFigueroa v Foster, USCA, Second Circuit, Docket Nos. 16-1856-cv(L), 16-1864-cv(XAP)The issue before the Court in this action concerned whether the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act [NLRA] preempted the New York State Human Rights Law [NYSHRL] with respect to claims of unlawful discrimination filed by a union member against a labor… [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:38 am
A New York state intermediate appeals court recently upheld the “plain meaning” of a so-called “insured v. insured” exclusion contained in a not-for-profit directors and officers liability policy, but narrowly construed the exclusion. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:02 am
But while this seems clearly right as a matter of policy and intent, it is not as clear as it might be in the language, even though the inclusion of the word “net”—in addition, presumably, to allowing changes in multiple taxes to offset each other—does suggest it. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 7:21 pm
In a recent Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division case (State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 7:21 pm
In a recent Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division case (State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The Secretary of State, in contrast, argued that the words complained of meant that Butt was someone who had expressed views contrary to British values. [read post]
