Search for: "Street v. New York" Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
New York's highest court has reached a similar conclusion, indicating that "[s]tanding alone, the surrender of control or disclaimer of ownership does not always establish a waiver. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 9:46 am by Rachel Brown, Coleman Saunders
In several cities, including Seattle, New York and Chicago, individuals also reported that a few police officers deployed to the protests covered their badge numbers with tape. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
The New York Times’s Peter Baker reviews the new documentary Advise & Dissent, which focuses on the politics and activism behind the scenes of the Roberts, Miers, and Alito nominations. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School:  A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
In Santangelo v State of New York , the Court of Appeals held that, under the common law, police officers were considered experts engaged, trained and compensated by the public to deal on its behalf with emergencies and hazards often created by negligence and, therefore, generally cannot recover damages for negligence in the very situations that create the occasion for their services. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Defendant is the owner of a townhouse located at 44 East 82nd Street, New York, New York (the Premises) (NY St Cts Elec Filing [NYSCEF] Doc No. 34, affidavit of John. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
City of New York Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals The Windsor Place v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Matthew Scarola
Quon and New Process Steel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Adam Liptak of the New York Times writes that the decision in Trump v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The copyright lawsuit brought by the heirs of the songwriter who composed Marvin Gaye’s “Let’s Get It On” continued last week in New York. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court recently elucidated the structure of the required analysis in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc v Bruen (2022). [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage comes from Robert Barnes in The Washington Post, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Richard Wolf in USA Today, Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal, Mark Walsh in Education Week, and Jurist’s Paper Chase blog. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at Fox News, Kelly Shackleford weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
American citizens working for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post have been caught  latest in a series of tit-for-tat actions between the Trump administration and the Chinse government, as China’s foreign ministry announced that those with credentials expiring before the end of the year must surrender their press cards within ten days. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:43 am by Ben
The article was informing the public that the streets in Midtown New York City were car-free in order to provide for outdoor festivities, including ping pong. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am by Daniel Gilman
” And as Gus had pointed out, even the New York Times seemed skeptical. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:51 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
” The Court found that New York State Town Law §277 made no provision for a hold back of permits, in addition to the financial security imposed, as set forth in the Clarkstown local law. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
This Court’s clarification of whether human health is the new actionable threshold for contamination and final resolution as to the corr-ect meaning of “non-natural” use is required to provide landowners, regulators and industrial actors across Canada with certainty around their 1 St Lawrence Cement Inc. v. [read post]