Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 2841 - 2860 of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm by Florian Mueller
But, at least for now, the related case law in the United States is fundamentally better than in Germany, though this may be attributable in no small part to the historic happenstance of what cases were put before the courts in what sequence--and what questions for review the parties raised.Just so there is no misunderstanding: Dr. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
High profile cases in the United States and Canada include the 2011 claim against Warner Bros. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm by Érika Bergeron-Drolet
High profile cases in the United States and Canada include the 2011 claim against Warner Bros. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
He did not accept the offer and was still a unit holder in 2015 when, as part of a restructuring, each of the LLC members, including plaintiff, exchanged their units for membership interests in a company that acquired all of the LLC’s assets. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
He did not accept the offer and was still a unit holder in 2015 when, as part of a restructuring, each of the LLC members, including plaintiff, exchanged their units for membership interests in a company that acquired all of the LLC’s assets. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
On March 20, 2013 Microsoft requested permission to submit an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the standard-essential patents (SEPs) part of the "Posner appeal" (Apple v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
In a speech on the eve of the 1940 election addressing the United States’ defense capabilities as World War II engulfed Europe, Roosevelt pledged, “Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
Supreme Court issued three major rulings governing elections:  In Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:39 pm by Jay McDaniel
As demonstrated in a recent case from the Southern District of New York, Zip International Group, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
[Kruska] contends that [Brocious] also acted as contributor, owner, copyright holder, and moderator of the Blog. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:27 am by FDABlog HPM
  The MMA also amended the patent statute to provide that “courts of the United States shall, to the extent consistent with the Constitution, have subject matter jurisdiction in any action brought  . . . under [28 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:59 am
The Court summarizes the facts as follows: The petitioner was admitted into the United States in 1984 as a lawful permanent resident. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am by Ilya Somin
United States (1944), which had allowed the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:27 am by Susan Brenner
Debtor otherwise has no assets in the United States, is not a party to any lawsuits pending in the United States, and is not believed to be currently residing in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And Wells linked to a District Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:03 am by Florian Mueller
After the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided last week to deny Apple's motion for a rehearing en banc (full-bench review) of the Nexus ruling, some commentators suggested that this was the end of Apple's push for sales bans against Samsung and, looking beyond that dispute, all makers of Android-based, patent-infringing devices. [read post]