Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 12:37 am
Discusses whether the super injunction has had its day, following the Queen’s Bench Division rulings in DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB), AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) and Gray v UVW [2010] EWHC 2367 (QB) in which anonymity orders, rather than super injunctions, were made. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:48 pm
” Some U.S. commentators compared the case to Marbury v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
Older Cases The BP Refinery case moves forward with the long-sought deposition of the former CEO Lord Browne. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
The United Kingdom Supreme Court judgment authorising Assange’s extradition to Sweden Carl Gardner: Lord Kerr on the Assange case Carl Gardner: Supreme Court judgment: Assange v Swedish Judicial Authority Carl Gardner: Could Assange apply to set aside the Supreme Court judgment? [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
It is neither stated nor implied in the text. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Turley v Unite the Union, heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019 (Nicklin J) Kirkegaard v Smith, heard 26 November 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The Listings state that the 20ft Aluminium Flagpoles the consumers are considering purchasing are 'by DesignElements'. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
At the time this decision was rendered, the court was applying Askey v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
A claim in passing off could therefore not be sustained to protect goodwill that any reasonable person would consider to be trivial (Laddie J in Sutherland v V2 Music Ltd, [22]).Wenman claimed that her business was small but profitable, and that she had, since 2010, used the signs in question as descriptors of herself and the services she provided.In light of the evidence and submissions presented, HHJ Clarke was satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the columns in Prediction… [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:38 am
A sub-committee of the Commons DCMS Select Committee also published a reporton 24 January 2022, as did the Lords Communications and Digital Committee Inquiry on Freedom of Expression Online on 22 July 2021. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:59 pm
Bently's argument that the focus in eBay v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:38 pm
See State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm
As Lord Chief Justice Camden evocatively stated in Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 State Trials 1030, “the eye cannot by the laws of England be guilty of a trespass”. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 pm
As was stated in Re P(DM) v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
