Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 44,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2018, 3:36 am
A lot of people have quit, a lot of people have been fired. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:31 am
On the 50th Anniversary of New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:01 pm
In Capitol v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am
In Powell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:07 am
Int’l Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
Chan and Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 12:27 pm
Division 1 of this court reversed the conviction in People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
This case involves the affirmative defense that an putatively vicariously liable employer may assert in a sexual harassment case under Faragher v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:42 am
In People v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:00 am
Ctr. for Autism, Inc. v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:31 am
CARPENTER V. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
But many people can't get a lawyer, good or otherwise, because they can't afford one. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
People need to be aware that, albeit often illegally, they may be arrested by merely asking questions to officers who are arresting someone else. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
People need to be aware that, albeit often illegally, they may be arrested by merely asking questions to officers who are arresting someone else. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 2:00 pm
Wheeler 67 NY2d 960 and People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:12 pm
In People v Buie, the Michigan Supreme Court held that expert testimony by two-way video did not violate the defendant’s right of confrontation because the defendant’s counsel waived that right. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
The female driver, Valantein V. [read post]
