Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 25,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
All Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Instead of dealing with that issue (which appears to have been around whether two people between 18 and 21 had been looked after by the council previously under the CA, when accommodation had been provided under Part 7, Housing Act 1996), the Court of Appeal decided the claim on a preliminary issue. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Instead of dealing with that issue (which appears to have been around whether two people between 18 and 21 had been looked after by the council previously under the CA, when accommodation had been provided under Part 7, Housing Act 1996), the Court of Appeal decided the claim on a preliminary issue. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Maybe this desperation is more acute in these times, maybe it's an inevitable part of what it is to be human. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 12:54 pm
The supreme court therefore reverses the court of appeals' decision in People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm
This is why the Comical Case Names page already includes seven such entries, ranging from the 1941 classic United States v. 11 1/4 Dozen Packages of Articles Labeled in Part Mrs. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 9:35 am
I want to feel like I am a part of a community. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:00 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:50 pm
In a split decision, the majority explains that as part of its ongoing effort to limit the emission of greenhouse gases, U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 7:34 am
Spencer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 9:42 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
I've italicized part of it, and underlined part of it. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
He regularly misidentified people, was delusional, and was sometimes disoriented. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 10:13 pm
v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 1:30 pm
Biology v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:01 am
See People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:08 am
Cioca v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:49 am
Discount Tobacco City & Lottery, Inc. v. [read post]
