Search for: "Redding v. Redding" Results 2841 - 2860 of 7,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 6:53 am by John Jascob
Finally, Alpine maintains that the district court abused its discretion through the sheer size of the penalty (SEC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:22 pm by Neil Wilkof
., Ltd v Digi International Inc. [2020] SGIPOS 1.The Parties Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd (the "Opponent") is a Japanese company dealing inter alia, in electronic price-computing scales named 'DIGI'. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
  This question was recently answered by the District Court of Oregon in Jacobus Rentmeester v Nike Inc., (No.3 : 15-cv-00113-MO). [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:46 pm
  (The Fifth Circuit case is Bledsoe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am by Cyberleagle
In the red corner we have preoccupation with verifying identity of the signatory, with technically engineered digital signatures and with the EU’s eIDAS hierarchy of qualified, advanced and ordinary electronic signatures. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:18 am
On 26 December last, commenting on Redd v Red, the latest of a long line of failed "own name" defences to trade mark infringement, the author of this post wrote: "The IPKat, who enjoyed reading this decision, wonders if anyone is keeping a list of trade mark infringement cases in which the defence of "I'm only using my own name", so often raised, has ever succeeded: if such a list exists, it must be a pretty short one, even if one includes passing-off actions and, in civil law… [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:39 am by John Jascob
The Supreme Court has instructed courts to consider all relevant factors when making this determination, including the six factors articulated by the Second Circuit in Gartenberg v. [read post]