Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 5:04 am
It's not that I don't care or wish there was a way in which people whose senses aren't working as they should could enjoy all that life offers. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:33 am
Don't get me wrong, I suspect if this case ever made it to trial, Mr. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 2:45 pm
But don't.The government drafts the indictment and the government is permitted to broadcast its contents to the community. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:11 am
If we don't affirmatively restrict the relief judges order in ex parte proceedings and teach judges to remember the potential abuses of the ex parte system, we are going to see more junky outcomes like this. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:19 pm
The judge was an idiot, but that didn't change the consequence where the gentleman could not afford an appeal. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:41 am
"It is very important that judges do not become robots that are guided by a statutory set of numbers that don't take into account the victim and don't take into account the defendant," Pilshaw said.Still, those pushing for more say battle lines have to be drawn with sex offenders. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
It doesn't mean Greer will actually go to trial, or that the trial will be on that date, but it gives us an opportunity to make some assumptions in order to get the community all riled up over what will be a certain delay (we call continuances "delays" because people don't like "delays. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 9:56 am
Statements like these, however, are not interpreted literally and therefore don't cause harm to reputation. [read post]
Donor, Legacy, and Athlete Preferences in Higher Education Admissions: Art Museum and Squash Edition
1 Nov 2022, 7:46 am
We can imagine the Court saying something like this: Even if race-neutral means such as eliminating ALDC preferences wouldn't get you all the racial diversity that you're legally entitled to pursue, if you don't pursue race-neutral means with full vigor--including by eliminating ALDCs--you are not permitted to use any race-based means. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 6:42 am
These policies don't directly affect the size of the carceral state in the same fashion as sentencing statutes, at least not in ways which can be measured, but indirectly they empower the prosecutors who Pfaff says are driving the train. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
” In short, we won’t go back. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 8:00 am
But when I don't have something to say, I don't beat myself up over it. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
Certainly courts don't have the exclusive power to say what the law is, even in statutory cases. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:27 pm
This one didn't. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:33 pm
My criticism of the defendants' position isn't limited to procedural matters, though. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:11 am
We can't have that. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:34 pm
Issacharoff: we don't know if Johnson applies to anyone. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 12:32 am
"I really don't know much about it. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
A justice simply can't or shouldn't sit on a case she handled below. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:23 am
“The court system doesn’t work if defendants don’t have competent representation,” Marsh said. [read post]
