Search for: "Gay v. State" Results 2861 - 2880 of 3,776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 3:30 am by SHG
We firmly believe that states cannot compel artists or anyone else to express messages with which they disagree. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by azatty
In April 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court, in Varnum v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:02 pm
The New York Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, recently issued an opinion in the case captioned, People v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:40 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Whatcott violated section 14(1)(b) of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code when he circulated flyers using extreme speech directed against gay men. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:23 am by admin
Zarda to determine discrimination against openly gay workers is prohibited under Title VII. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:19 pm by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
For example, in his ruling today, Judge Walker casts serious doubt on whether the proponents of Prop 8 even have "standing" to pursue an appeal because they do not speak for the state of California, and the official representatives of the state agree that Prop 8 is unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex marriage.Scholars of the… [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 am by Charles Sartain
Sentence: Awaiting, after an eight day trial. __________ Perp: Susan Gay Pruitt Offense: State securities fraud. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am by Giles Peaker
Any enhanced or modified statutory protections which do exist are expressly stated in EA 2010 and are limited to specific circumstances, for example, the discrimination provisions unique to pregnancy and maternity. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
Schweitzer, No. 06-35384 Dismissal of a state takings claims arising out of a state ban on open-pit mining for gold or silver by the cyanide heap leaching process is affirmed where the Eleventh Amendment bars a reverse condemnation action brought in federal court against state officers in their official capacities. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]