Search for: "Lock v. State"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 3,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
Locke, J.D. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:32 am
As mentioned earlier, the Supreme Court, in the 2010 case of Graham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
There will be law on the internet, and that law will be dictated by the United States of America. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am
The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 5:35 pm
As the United States Supreme Court explained long ago in Hudson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Asssoc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am
Even if it were not implicitly disclosed in D1, this feature was considered to be known in the state of the art as exemplified by D3.2.2 The appellant contested the findings of the examining division in the statement of the grounds of appeal. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:49 pm
§ 1462; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
"Shall we lock up a child and throw away the key? [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
Instead, they are sealed up, and locked away in a special safe, under a longstanding practice discussed and explained in a recent case. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:13 am
[She] told Swoyer she had not given her password to anyone, and stated that she always locked her computer when she walked away from a terminal. . . . [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Only in one instance have the Plaintiffs possibly stated a colorable claim. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:11 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 2.R. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
