Search for: "State v. Paul"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 8,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2020, 4:36 pm
The United States has designated China’s Official Media as Operatives of the Communist State. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:32 am
Law Lessons from FRANCINE BUNALSKI V. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:53 pm
V. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
TOM JUZWIAK V. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
The jurisprudence on names (in particular Grunkin and Paul) shows that the fact that a Member State does not have its own procedure for such changes (according to de la Tour, this concerns only 2 Member States for gender changes) does not constitute an obstacle to the recognition of a change lawfully made in another Member State (nos. 73-74). [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
* Paul Levy shines the spotlight on yet more questionable marketing practices by Lifestyle Lift. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:44 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Graham M. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
Just ask Justices David Souter, Sandra Day O’Connor, and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:16 am
Harleen Gambhir summarized the District Court for the Western District of Washington’s certification of the class in Wagafe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:17 am
Thom Tillis, R-N.C., former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel and former USPTO Director David Kappos, who stated that the “misinterpretation of Section 101 of our patent laws has created an unintelligible hash. [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am
Sarah Grant reported the latest from the military commission in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
To which extent may state authorities (in this case, the State of North Carolina) act as copyright pirates? [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am
Moreover, the cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 failed to sufficiently allege that the plaintiff suffered an injury proximately caused by any claimed deceit or collusion on the part of Dougherty, and no such injury can reasonably be inferred from the amended complaint (see Gumarova v Law Offs. of Paul A. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:52 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (2): Paul Mayes v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:47 pm
V. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
BNET reported today that News America Marketing CEO Paul Carlucci's video deposition was played in the Valassis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Western District of KentuckyOpinion Date: 5/27/10Cite: JSC Terminal, LLC v. [read post]
