Search for: "Cooper v. United States" Results 2881 - 2900 of 3,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2022, 4:33 am by Jon L. Gelman
COVID is the most extensive occupational exposure event in the history of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
United States, the court held that contracts for future exchanges should be considered the same as a simultaneous exchange. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division noted that this contention was rejected by the Court of Appeals in Kolbe v Tibbets, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  New spirit of cooperation and momentum in Washington. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Katrina Eiland
The United States has made a commitment — by law and by treaty — to protect people who come to this country fleeing persecution. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm by Guest Author
But that record has evaporated thanks to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]