Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 12,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 10:58 pm
Of the other BRICS countries, Russia has a PAW index of +1, but at a much higher overall level of development (58/57). [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:24 am
Call me an optimist, but this Kat does not see the future for PDD and the IPR protection in China bleak. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm
Tylman has done just about everything she can to prove to the voters of Miami-Dade County that she does not belong on the bench.1. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:12 am
And why does it seems to be such a big deal (actually, it really is …)? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
Explaining what 'evidence' means can have some evident side-effects on non-economists So what does all this mean? [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:54 pm
It does not. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 8:14 am
And by the way, does Trump get credit for vigilance about violence against women? [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:59 am
J 27/90, J 11/06 and J 1/07, which are the leading decisions in the section of the Case Law book referred to earlier], the fact that someone else is in charge for the payment of fees merely exempts the European representative from paying fees himself, but does not exclude his responsibility to monitor such deadlines and eventually send reminders. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 10:30 am
See §§1605A, 1610(a)(7), (b)(3), (f)(1)(A); §201(a) of the TRIA. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm
The report outlines four overriding objectives to achieve the recommendations including: 1. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:42 am
The hush money payment did not occur until October 27, 2016, less than two weeks before the general election for President. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
” 27 N.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Consequently, the differing wording in Art. 43 Brussels Regulation does not result in a substantive change which leads to the result that the Court’s interpretation of the Convention in this respect - according to which Art. 36 of the Convention excludes procedures whereby interested third parties may challenge an enforcement order under domestic law (see para. 27 and C-148/84 (para. 17)) - can be transferred to the Regulation (paras. 24, 30). [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
Gilead claimed that this product was protected by Claim 27 of European Patent No 0 915 894 (the '894 Patent). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:30 am
Reg. 285/01, s. 2 (1); O. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
On the top row (l-r)are Chinese coins #1 (c.400 BC), #2 (c.300 BC), #3 (C.300 BC), #12, and #13.The bottom row (l-r) displays coins #16, #17 and the envelope labeled CyprusPtolemaeus Head of Zeus, and coin #19. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
Does This Make Sense? [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Sandy Levinson, Malfeasance and Misfeasance (May 12, 2006)27. [read post]
