Search for: "Johnson v. Case"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 7,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2007, 1:45 pm
So that's $124,000 -- plus attorney fees on appeal -- down.Not only that, but Justice Johnson also makes fairly clear (without expressly holding) that had O'Melveny filed a cross-appeal of the haircut it took on fees, it almost certainly would have won, since it's impermissible to whack a fee request on the ground that you "knew going in" that it was probably a pro bono case. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Lamb v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 8:43 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:58 am
See Johnson, supra. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:40 am
This old proverb, which I thought was spoken by Dr Samuel Johnson, is still apt.Apparently, it has now made its way into caselaw, at least in the US.Family law cases occur ordinarily when the emotions are running high. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
From: Findlaw Case Summaries, September 5, 2008 Summaries from September 1-5, 2008. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:33 am
The style of the case is, State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
Johnson, 921 F.3d 991, 1001 (11th Cir. 2019) (William Pryor, J.) [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
Reverdy Johnson represented the appellants (Waring et al.) in Waring v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Then came those appellate preemption cases....Anyway, now we’re finally getting around to it (sorry, Ralph). [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Hoffman v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
The court then said that while “numerous cases have held that it is possible for an individual to maintain more than one bona fide residence, in People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm
In Gunn v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:59 pm
Dear Readers:I recommend to you U.S. ex rel Johnson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
Kevin Johnson previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:46 am
Here is the essence of today's holding:Three Terms ago, in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 7:48 pm
Johnson, 2010ONCA 646 (CanLII), [2010] OJ No 4153 4. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
Johnson, No. 166 In a child pornography case, the court's application of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders risk Factor 7, indicating an increased level of risk when a crime "was directed at a stranger," is affirmed over defendant's claim that Factor 7 be interpreted in a way that makes it inapplicable to his case, where the factor's plain language precludes such a result. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:43 am
Johnson, 2008 U.S. [read post]
