Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 2881 - 2900 of 20,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm by Ronald Mann
The tone of Hawkins’ argument was set three sentences into his presentation, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg interrupted to ask pointedly: “Is it not the case that no other political entity would be immune from such a quiet-title suit, not the United States, not a state of the United States, not a foreign government? [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
LAPINE, Defendant. 3:05cv1712(WWE) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 2008 U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She is a legend, going back to her work on the LCO treaty rights cases in Wisconsin, the LeBlanc matter in Michigan, and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Privilege operates on personal, interpersonal, cultural and institutional levels, and it provides advantages and favors to members of dominant groups at the expense of members of other groups… In the United States, privilege is granted to people who have membership in one or more of these social identity groups: White people, able-bodied people, heterosexuals, cisgender people, males, Christians, middle or owning class people,… [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, one of the cases that they considered at their private conference last week. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
”  Yep, that leaves the Department of Justice, arguing on behalf of the United States of America, as one of the outliers. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Karl Bayer
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am by JB
The constitutional question in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 10:23 pm by Florian Mueller
The factual record developed by the ALJs is, however, also available to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), to whom U.S. presidents typically delegate their Presidential veto power over ITC exclusion orders. [read post]