Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 4,257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
Saul also discussed the recent California Court of Appeals decision of Taylor v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:20 am
"Typically such termination is "by operation of law" and all that is required is the appointing authority determination that Section 30.1(e) applies with respect to the individual involved.In Bowman v Kerik, 271 A.D.2d 225, the court said that Section 30.1(e) of the Public Officers Law provides that a public office becomes vacant upon the conviction of the incumbent "of a felony, or a crime involving a violation of his oath of office. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
B.L., and People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:56 am
--Beth Taylor [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:52 am
Taylor, still failed. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:01 am
One case (Parker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:15 am
But he wrote a strong dissent in the Texas v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:18 am
Challenging arbitration awards Coppa v State of New York, NYS Supreme Court, Justice A. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
However the rule is substantially similar to the federal rule, and so here's the Ninth Circuit's take on the issue (from Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Taylor, infra, at para. 34 The most-consulted French-language decision was Sorel-Tracy (Ville de) c. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947). [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:15 pm
App. 1997) (lease termination for illegal activity) Taylor v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Barnes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The Court disagreed, citing SCOTUS’s Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 3:51 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
The Spain’s action gave birth to Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:44 am
(quoting Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
