Search for: "United States v. Borders" Results 2881 - 2900 of 3,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Dunlap own two parcels in northern Washington state in the city of Nooksack, which appears to us to be just a short American Goldfinch flight from the Canadian-American border (the Goldfinch is the official State Bird of Washington...work with us here). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:19 am by Susan Brenner
The 9th Circuit explained that it had reached the same conclusion in interpreting similar language in other criminal statutes: In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:19 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Such was the case with, for example, the weighty claim by a group of Gitmo detainees that winning their habeas cases entitled them to release in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by David Zaring
The securities industry initially brought the case Lucia v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:38 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Such was the case with, for example, the weighty claim by a group of Gitmo detainees that winning their habeas cases entitled them to release in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:31 am by Hayley Evans, Shannon Togawa Mercer
Chapter V of GDPR governs the legality of transfers of personal data to third countries and allows for the transfer of data to a third country when the EC decides that “a third country...ensures an adequate level of protection” or when there are appropriate safeguards in place. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Cody Poplin
The air strikes mark the third time that the United States has attacked the al Qaeda affiliate since beginning of bombing last year. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:36 pm
Regarding those aspects of the program that involved interception of the international communications of U.S. persons in the United States, Yoo asserted that Fourth Amendment jurisprudence allowed for searches of persons crossing the border and that interceptions of communications into or out of the United States fell within the "border crossing exception. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]