Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2021, 1:59 pm
The Tims decision marks the first appellate guidance regarding this issue. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:39 pm
” State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:49 am
Kudos to Mark Thoma for his injection of a bracing note of clarity into the debate over what we get v. what we pay in "social welfare" taxes. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The new rules mark a radical departure from the previous rules, which required broadly that parties should be able to maintain and accommodate themselves and any dependents “adequately in the UK without recourse to public funds”. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Garon, Jim Gibson, Eric Goldman, Stacey Lantagne, Mark A. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
The verbal description of the mark states: "The mark consists of a three dimensional ivory-coloured tile on the top surface of which is shown a letter of the Roman alphabet and a number in the range of 1 to 10". [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 3:00 am
Schlafly v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:45 pm
Eveready Battery Company, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:13 pm
The case cite is Ezell’s Fried Chicken, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:46 am
Marquez Brothers International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
Secondly, either the users or the operators of the website must be infringing the claimant’s trade marks. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Debbie Kaminer, Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in EEOC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:54 pm
A model car manufacturer continued selling Bulli models in packaging stating that they were "officially licenced" after its licence agreement was terminated, but raised questions of "genuine use" of the mark during the infringement proceedings. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:54 pm
Franchisee Ass’n-USA v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:30 am
There was nothing to show that the film has been shown on television or distributed on DVD in the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 10:25 am
Thermolife Int’l, LLC v. [read post]
