Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 2901 - 2920 of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
These Conferences brought together large numbers of Chicano youth from throughout the United States and provided them with opportunities to express their views on self-determination. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Favre (Michigan State), Katherine Anne Meyer (Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C.). [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
This panel decision essentially abdicates judicial review of a race-conscious admissions program for undergraduate University of Texas students that favors two groups, African–Americans and Hispanics, in one of the most ethnically diverse states in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Examples of such states include California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Tennessee, among others. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm by John Ross
United States (1935), which until recently limited this sort of thing. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:45 am by Paul Levy
  Therefore, there was no basis for compelling the identification of the web site’s operator.The standards for identifying anonymous Internet speakers was also addressed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in In re Anonymous Online Speakers, where the court declined to issue a mandamus overturning the discovery ruling in Quixtar Management v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But the Court could avoid saying anything about the Constitution by ruling that the statute forbids race-based affirmative action.Here's the key language of Title VI: "No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be . . . subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am by Leslie Sammis
McNeil in courtroom 1, and in Division "V" are heard by The Honorable Dick Greco, Jr., in courtroom 2 at 301 North Michigan Ave., Plant City, FL 33563.What is a violence injunction? [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]