Search for: "Evans v. Evans"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 3,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm
Evans, barring a state constitutional amendment in Colorado taking away existing rights that gays and lesbians previously had in that state. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
For example in Walker v. [read post]
Section 230 Doesn’t Protect App Stores That Sell Virtual Chips for Casino Apps–In re Apple App Store
6 Sep 2022, 9:25 am
Apple, and Evans v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 17 February 2021 Saini J heard an application in the case of Weaver v British Airways. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
The “skeptical” blogger Jack of Kent has a piece “Libel Reform the Day after the General Election” lamenting the failure of Dr Evan Harris and Joanne Cash to attract the support of the voters. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:31 am
There is an existing precedent from the English court in this respect: the case of Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Limited. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
The Court also considered but distinguished the South African case of Plascon-Evans Paints (TVL) Ltd. v Van Riebeck Paints (Pty) Ltd, 1984 (3) SA 623, relating to the marks MICATEX and MIKACOTE in which the two marks were found to be similar and likely to cause confusion. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:53 pm
While Rusbridger was very concerned by the recent anonymisation of the parties in a libel case (ZAM v CFW), he was more reluctant to criticise the contra mundum order in OPQ v BJM and CJM. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:33 pm
The Court thus equated Proposition 8 to the Colorado laws struck down in Romer v Evans, and structured its decision around the fact that Proposition 8 singled out homosexual couples for differential treatment by removing a right which they had previously enjoyed on an equal basis to everyone else. [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:59 pm
The Court distinguished its decision in Bazemore v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:38 pm
The Court thus equated Proposition 8 to the Colorado laws struck down inRomer v Evans, and structured its decision around the fact that Proposition 8 singled out homosexual couples for differential treatment by removing a right which they had previously enjoyed on an equal basis to everyone else. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:40 am
The Court also decided United States v. [read post]
