Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 2921 - 2940 of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by Peter Huang
 The idea that some people may not just want anticipated memories is viscerally illustrated by a debate among characters in the science fiction thriller, Total Recall, about utilizing the services of Rekall, Inc. which is a corporation that provides implanted false memories of ideal virtual holidays. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:36 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the... [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 8:47 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
This is the basis for Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or... [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
[A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
We ban a lot of people from flying because of that. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
While it may make sense to grant them an extra zone of protection vis-a-vis threats, public officials understandably have less protection when it comes to privacy and criticism. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by admin
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:08 am by INFORRM
Be that as it may, she and her children had been through the care system on a number of occasions. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
Photographers beware, you may want to take note of a case from the First Department yesterday - People v Zapata, 2007 NY Slip Op 04687. [read post]