Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 8,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 12:06 am
Most defendants, like most people generally, will have some devices with internet access, so such a requirement woud be both onerous and add little of any value. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
There is a short tribute on the 5RB website. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:32 pm
Note also that it is in general accord with People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm
Earlier today, I live-blogged the argument to a Ninth Circuit panel in Perry v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
(Citing Desmond v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 10:36 am
It's a short case that efficiently makes several powerful pedagogical points--including perhaps most importantly, the perils of robo-drafting by copying language from other people's agreements. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:21 am
Many people think Roubini will be proved right yet again. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In some important respects, the short answer turns out to be very little. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:43 pm
These number about 12 people. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:25 pm
Baltimore, and Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
Blockchain v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
Following the Florida Supreme Court’s April, 2016 decision in Castellanos v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
Following the Florida Supreme Court’s April, 2016 decision in Castellanos v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:01 pm
Ceesary v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
To that end each of us prepared a short engagement with distinct sets of insights developed by Professor Cohen (Introduction here). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:31 am
This is where Suk’s support of the progressive agenda falls short. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
Alam v LB Tower Hamlets[2009] EWHC 44 (Admin) is one of those interesting cases that you get in allocations - well, interesting because a council like LB Tower Hamlets should probably know better than to have an obscure clause in its allocations scheme which surely will be challenged sooner rather than later (that it took three years is mildly surprising). [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
Alam v LB Tower Hamlets[2009] EWHC 44 (Admin) is one of those interesting cases that you get in allocations - well, interesting because a council like LB Tower Hamlets should probably know better than to have an obscure clause in its allocations scheme which surely will be challenged sooner rather than later (that it took three years is mildly surprising). [read post]
