Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 18,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
In Diamond v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
And Infinity Steel Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
In Institutional Investors Group v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:02 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In Rubenstein v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
In Inter-Cooperative Exchange v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
Under this sales tax framework, the addition of sales tax reimbursement to the cost of an item is an indication of that item’s fair market value: the total and highest price to which the willing buyer and seller agree. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
And on that central point, the California Supreme Court says absolutely nothing.The price of unanimity and speed here may be that, given the concession, we've resolve the tangential dispute, but not helped at all to decide what's really at issue and what motivated the decision below.But, hey. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:48 pm
Portillo claim that at the trial, the only evidence of this fact came from nonadmissible hearsay, when the warehouse manager testified at trial that these were the prices he saw when he looked up the dumbbells online.Resulting, today, in a 45-page opinion that an evidence professor would drool over, in which Justice Feuer thinks that the testimony was admissible nonhearsay for one reason, whereas Justice Segal believes that it is admissible nonhearsay for a different reason. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:51 pm
In that prosecution, "[d]uring an overnight flight from Tokyo, Japan to Los Angeles, California, Juan Pablo Price, a forty-six-year-old man, moved from his assigned seat to an open seat adjacent to that of a sleeping twenty-one-year-old female Japanese student, where he fondled her breast and slipped his hand into her underwear, touching her vagina. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:44 am
Although Silver’s complaint included publicly available information, his personal knowledge of non-public information about defendant PharMerica’s pricing was critical to his allegations of fraudulent conduct. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 3:30 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:50 am
Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Exploiting the price differential between the US and overseas can be quite profitable. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:00 am
” Pearlstein v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:00 am
” Pearlstein v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:31 am
One of the consequences of these price controls is that the entry of a generic product onto the market results in an immediate, and irreversible, 16% drop in the price that the government will pay for the drug. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:48 am
This morning, in a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Kennedy, in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
