Search for: "State v. Downes" Results 2921 - 2940 of 36,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Policy responses in recent years have included banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes[6], greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads[7], differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions[8], and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[9] However, the underlying problem remains: high cigarette taxes amount to a “price prohibition” on the legal product in many U.S. states.[10] International Cigarette Smuggling… [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Policy responses in recent years have included banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes,[6] greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads,[7] differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions,[8] and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[9] However, the underlying problem remains: high cigarette taxes amount to a “price prohibition” of the product in many U.S. states.[10] International Smuggling and Counterfeiting Puts Consumers… [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 12:56 pm
When he did claim his rights had been violated, Texas and federal courts turned him down because he had not objected at his trial. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:23 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court today handed down its anticipated decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Gilstrap--whose more formal title is Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas--handed down a scheduling order in the Ericsson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:03 pm by Valerie Sasaki
All summer we have been talking about the fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 7:26 pm by Jacek Stramski
State, 987 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007), and Al-Hakim v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
March 27th marked six months in the United States without an execution. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On the day of the request (about six weeks after the data of the publication of the comments), the applicant company took down the comments. 12 days later the applicant company notified L’s lawyers of the take-down, refusing to compensate L. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm by becassidy
District Court Judge Michael Watson ruled yesterday in the case Mays et. al v. [read post]