Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 2941 - 2960
of 56,500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 8:42 am
Section 3161(c)(1) of the Speedy Trial Act, In any case in which a plea of not guilty is entered, the trial of a defendant charged in an information or indictment with the commission of an offense... [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:45 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 611(c) provides that Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness' testimony. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:15 pm
According to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(c), “Hearsay” means a statement that: (1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter... [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:27 am
WMH Tool Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:25 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm
Miles de personas han sido víctimas de la activación secreta de sus cámaras web pero tienen pocos recursos bajo la legislación federal para vindicar sus derechos, de acuerdo al informe Digital Peepholes, cuyos autores son la profesora de IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, Lori Andrews y los abogados Michael Holloway y Dan Massoglia. [read post]
9 May 2008, 9:07 pm
El caso Méndez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
It is well settled that “[m]ere ownership of a domain name is not sufficient to show that a respondent automatically could claim protection under paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy,” Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:20 pm
The case of Hale v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:58 am
In the recent judgment, AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC [2011] EWCA Civ 647, the Court of Appeal held that an anti-suit injunction can be granted to restrain foreign proceedings brought in breach of an English arbitration agreement, even in the absence of an actual, proposed or intended arbitration.The dispute arose out of a concession agreement to produce hydroelectric energy between the state of Kazakhstan government (D) and a US company… [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Eagle v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
Only the First, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 3:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
C. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:18 am
Law Lessons from ERIC C. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm
Superior Court Judge John C. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:19 pm
Wardlaw, Raymond C. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:51 am
Se asume que los 2,041 se le pueden adjudicar al candidato Edgardo Cruz Vélez, que estaba postulándose por nominación directa. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:30 pm
Por el contrario, las mismas se erigen de espaldas a nuevos e importantes fundamentos científicos y jurídicos reconocidos por la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos en Roper v Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), Graham v Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), Miller v Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) y Montgomery v Louisiana, 577 U.S. ___ (2016). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
THE MONTANA THRITEENTY JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, AND THE HONORABLE RUSSELL C. [read post]
