Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 2941 - 2960 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
" Derogatory, The Practical Standard Dictionary of the English Language (1936); see also State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
It's not quite eleven-a-side, but the much-contested case of Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA, Union de Associations de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Limited, Setanta Sports SARL, Group Canal Plus SA and The Motion Picture Association v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, Sanjay Raval, David Greenslade, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen; The Secretary of… [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:05 pm
Fleisher of Gutter Chaves Josepher Rubin Forman Fleisher P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida, was on the winning side of Hernandez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am by INFORRM
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:44 pm
This week's Supreme Court ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:55 am by Ralf Michaels
Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit left the question open in 2002 (Virtual Countries, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Reuters had a piece “English football faces up to global nature of online hate”. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
The amended bill, for instance, excises the requirement of serious harm, the cornerstone of the English reforms and the subject of heated debate during the progress of the bill. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]