Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 2941 - 2960 of 7,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
We believe this action could be a model for future investor claims outside the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 8:00 pm by Kyla Stott-Jess
The development of class action law in in the employment context has been slower north of the 49th parallel than in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Prior to his current position, he states he was a Vice President in the Portfolio Retention Department at Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, and prior to that he says he was Vice President of Loan Services at World Savings Bank, FSB. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the  rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
[An interesting threats case, from the Louisiana Court of Appeal] From Terrell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
The effects have been profound, especially with respect to the role of states, and especially of the United States as its long time position in global affairs undergoes significant change. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
§ 1514A.The plaintiffs, joined by the intervening plaintiff United States Secretary of Labor, sought an injunction enforcing a preliminary order of the Secretary which required CTI to reinstate the plaintiffs to their previous positions. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by Anna Christensen
United States, Hardt, Rent-a-Center West v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am by Hannah Buxbaum
Justice Scalia begins by quoting Aramco on that presumption: "legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]