Search for: "State v. Paul" Results 2941 - 2960 of 8,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As noted in People v Paul, whether a foundation for the experience and training is set forth or not, it seems that, as a matter of fundamental fairness, defendant should not have to proceed to trial in a narcotics case unless and until a laboratory report has been filed by the People. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:34 am by WSLL
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Justin A. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
  Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm by Reference Staff
Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Association, 443 U.S. 658 (1979) and Washington v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
United States 1984) and barns (United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
It was a facial challenge that failed in state courts. [read post]