Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 2941 - 2960 of 4,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Ayo Aladesanmi
The restructuring within the agency comes on the heels of West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
Cheese-associated outbreaks of human illness in the United States, 1973 to 1992: sanitary manufacturing practices protect consumers. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
    The Chicago 2016 Proposal projects an Olympics budget of $5 billion, including $1.1 billion for the construction of the Olympic Village, $366 million for the Olympic Stadium, and $80 million for an aquatics center.[5]  Initially, Daley stated the funding would come exclusively from private investors, with Chicago 2016 projecting a $525 million operating surplus.[6]  That changed, however, after USOC Vice President Bob Ctvrtlik indicated that a… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
By Matthew Werber The Federal Circuit caught the attention of the ITC and trade secret litigators alike when it ruled in TianRui Group Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
§ 5C1.2 for a defendant convicted of conspiracy to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute marijuana plants in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
He would not let her take the potted plant because he paid for the pot, so he ripped it out of the pot and threw it at her. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]