Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 2961 - 2980
of 35,565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2014, 10:41 am
And the girlfriend, being an idiot, makes the sale.Which, not surprisingly, leads to a more than a little pressure being applied on the girlfriend to help the police. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:42 pm
Plus has a neat little stateless-citizen-federal-diversity-jurisdiction issue thrown in there for good measure.But I nonetheless can't help thinking that it's the equivalent of an opinion that says that exactly 48.6 angels can fit on an average-size pin manufactured in the eastern seaboard of the United States. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
But in the meantime, add this to the list of who's on one side and who's on the other.Plus, this case has a neat little twist that I haven't seen before. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 2:18 pm
And after pleading guilty (after some adverse pretrial rulings from the district court), Roger is sentenced to five years in prison and Sherryanne, his "assistant manager" (and eventual wife), receives a little over two years.The Ninth Circuit affirms. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 12:26 pm
It's a tiny little aside, and maybe not even all that clever. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 1:08 pm
I'm not exactly sure why the resulting (unanimous) 26-page opinion took over a year and a half to create; that's an awfully long time.But I'm sure that Judge Kozinski would say you can't rush quality.Or even nudge it along a little. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Ho-hum.It's nonetheless a little unusual in a couple of ways. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
And, as if that wasn't enough, the Ninth Circuit's opinion drops this little nugget in a footnote on page seven: "Hours after murdering Officer Martin, Martinez robbed a convenience store in Blythe, California, and fatally shot the store clerk. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:04 pm
And, indeed, it's a financial success, and CashCall obtains over a quarter billion dollars in fees and interest from the program.Ultimately, however, the Consumer Financial Protection Board sues them, and obtains a civil penalty of a little over $10 million. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 12:57 pm
When I'm wrong, I'm wrong.Vis-a-vis this opinion, I was a little bit of both.When the panel decision came out late last year, I was definitely on board with the majority opinion by Judge Friedland. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:38 pm
One great thing about Court of Appeal opinions is that they sometimes give you a real-world glimpse into portions of society that you'd otherwise know little about. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:26 pm
Fortunately, all that happened was that appellant was arrested and placed on probation.It's also a neat little appeal because it's one that's basically based on a law review article: Northrop & Rosen's piece entitled “Kids Will be Kids: Time for a ‘Reasonable Child’ Standard for the Proof of Objective Mens Rea Elements. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
I would have thought that "criminal property damage in the first degree" was a lot less dangerous than arson, extortion or explosives.Just goes to show you potentially how little I know. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 10:15 am
Here's a neat little reminder about how one deciphers the "holding" of an opinion when each of the judges on the court writes separately to articulate an idiosyncratic view about how the case should come out.Mr. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 1:18 pm
But too much of that gets your really good jury verdict reversed.Case in point.There are lots of tiny little evidentiary errors here. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:04 am
Especially since he says -- quite credibly -- that since he only had eight months on his sentence, there was no way he'd be so stupid as to jeopardize that status for a little weed.Which makes sense. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
On the "low level litigation" front, here's a neat little published opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 12:53 pm
Since they didn't publish anything today either.But at least the California Court of Appeal did a little work.Reversing the trial court, the Court of Appeal holds that, yes, it may well be deceptive for Skype to advertise that it offers "unlimited" calls to the U.S. and Canada (as well as elsewhere) when, in fact, these services are manifestly limited to six hours a day, fifty numbers per day, ten thousand minutes a month, etc.I'm fairly surprised that the trial court held otherwise. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:54 pm
[with] a pack of Camel cigarettes," since kids that age obviously should not be chain-smoking like the victim here did, but in context, that's the least of the sorrows here.)But there's only a tiny bit of evidence that he actually was the one who killed her; a little of (maybe) his DNA on her belt buckle, and proof that he owned knives (Jessica was killed with one), but that's about it. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:12 pm
But isn't there something a little lame about attaching the district court's opinion as a Westlaw printout? [read post]
