Search for: "Adam Baker"
Results 281 - 300
of 573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2008, 5:22 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges Darden and Bradford. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:11 am
This is, as most else is, just Adam Smith: we owe our daily bread not to benevolence but to greed. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:40 am
This was followed by discussion and questions by an audience of at least 300 students by Judges Moses Baker, Martha Warner and Ron Alvarez about how the Constitution comes into play in our day-to-day activities. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 6:17 am
PS- for more thoughts on this, please check out this great post by Adam Baker. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:07 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “[m]easur[es] varying levels of complexity” in the Supreme Court’s opinions this term. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman tests the claim that “Justice Scalia changed the tenor of oral arguments and specifically gave rise to the ‘hot bench’ of justices who ask many questions. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that Monday’s other argument, in Ayestas v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:10 am
The speakers are: Anthony Baker (Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School); Stephen Clowney (University of Arkansas College of Law); Lia Epperson (American University Washington College of Law); Elizabeth Glazer (Hostra University Law School); Jamila Jefferson-Jones (Barry University School of Law); Adam G. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 1:22 pm
This year, Juan Diaz, Jordan Dulcie, Adam Hecht, Yasmeen Lewis, Guy Murphy, David Vitale, and Boris Zhadanovskiy have been selected for this honor, showcasing the bright future of our firm. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:13 am
I am deeply grateful to my friends at Orrick for making this possible for me and, in a future report coming to "Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 5:57 am
Adam L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
In the New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on recent criticism of the Court (as well as the federal judiciary more generally) by Republican presidential candidates. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
Here's the list of shame: Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein did not make a single female partner (0 of 8 new partners were female). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
The review panel was composed of three independent lawyers: Rt Hon Sir Scott Baker, David Perry QC and Anand Doobay. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
The Court of Appeal has taken a different view to that of Mr Justice Baker in the Court of Protection, and decided that Article 5 of the ECHR was not engaged in P’s case. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Raymond Radigan and Adam J. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps finds echoes of past justices in the case, arguing that the modern democracy shaped by the court’s 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
” In an op-ed at Fox News, Adam Carrington finds the justices’ reluctance “to rule on the constitutionality of gun regulations in a systematic fashion” “both strange and problematic. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
The Supreme Court has announced that the judgments of the following linked cases, heard 22 – 24 November 2010, will be handed down on Wednesday 13 April 2011 – Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others; Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others (Meridian Limited); and Baker v Quantum Clothing Group Limited and others (Pretty Polly Limited) . [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Bork was an adamant opponent of what is variously known as the right of privacy, the doctrine of unenumerated rights, or substantive due process — the principle established in a line of cases including Griswold v. [read post]
