Search for: "Barber v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2023, 6:25 pm
In Antonyuk v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Fla.) a couple of weeks ago in Denton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
But in Yick Wo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
Barber, [2002] O.J. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
Barber, ___ N.C. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:56 am
This isn’t a Butler v. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
” Aaradhya Bachchan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 3:34 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:24 pm
Prob C §16068; Salter v Lerner (2009) 176 CA4th 1184. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
”) (internal citation omitted); Barber v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Indeed, sometimes it seems that they view constitutionalism not just as a normative benchmark, but as the exclusivenormative standard in relation to a state’s institutional setup: for the authors, asking whether something “must be permitted” is the same question as asking whether “constitutionalism requires that they be permitted” (10). [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:07 pm
To support their decision, the appellate court cites State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:19 am
Indeed, the University of Ottawa stated in an email sent to the student body on Friday February 4th that it was going to close Tabaret Hall and some parking lots on the northern end of campus, near where protests had been taking place. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 am
As Justice Robert Jackson stated in his dissent in Korematsu v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
